| From: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: parallel append vs. simple UNION ALL |
| Date: | 2018-03-16 11:08:41 |
| Message-ID: | CAFjFpRfrQ8Hdr0fYnPRVHHgOTQEFt2DbR2weHuU0MTs2oz_ntg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 2:09 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 12:35 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
> <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>> It looks like it was not changed in all the places. make falied. I
>> have fixed all the instances of these two functions in the attached
>> patchset (only 0003 changes). Please check.
>
> Oops. Thanks.
>
> I'm going to go ahead and commit 0001 here. Any more thoughts on the rest?
Nope. I am good with the patchset.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2018-03-16 11:16:10 | Re: [HACKERS] why not parallel seq scan for slow functions |
| Previous Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2018-03-16 11:01:45 | Re: [HACKERS] Another oddity in handling of WCO constraints in postgres_fdw |