| From: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alexander Kuzmenkov <a(dot)kuzmenkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: PoC: full merge join on comparison clause |
| Date: | 2017-10-09 10:47:52 |
| Message-ID: | CAFjFpRfP0Q_+j_9oZ5Jsi7SwQyrx+BgVfvE=zUeZHuinPPsVdw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Alexander,
Commit c7a9fa399 has added another test on mergeopfamilies. I think
your patch will need to take care of that test.
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Alexander Kuzmenkov
<a(dot)kuzmenkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> As discussed earlier, I changed the way we work with mergeopfamilies. I use
> the "is_equality" flag to indicate whether the clause is an equality one,
> and fill mergeopfamilies for both equality and inequality operators.
> The updated patch is attached (rebased to 20b6552242).
>
>
> --
> Alexander Kuzmenkov
> Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
> The Russian Postgres Company
>
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | amul sul | 2017-10-09 11:14:29 | Re: [POC] hash partitioning |
| Previous Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2017-10-09 10:42:19 | Re: separate serial_schedule useful? |