| From: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tables are not supported |
| Date: | 2018-06-19 04:49:35 |
| Message-ID: | CAFjFpReorwO6e4em=xtBMaeniEyFWX2HMKTp-6feHtPuVKY3eQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 3:51 AM, Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net> wrote:
>
> So +1 for thinking we do need to worry about it. I'm not exactly sure
> how we want to expose that info; with \d+ we list various "Partition
> X:" sections, perhaps adding one for "Partition triggers:" would be
> enough, although I am inclined to think it needs exposure at the \d
> level.
Something like this or what Alvaro proposed will be helpful.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2018-06-19 04:51:18 | Re: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tables are not supported |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2018-06-19 04:45:16 | Re: Slow planning time for simple query |