Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: postgres_fdw: Push down joins to remote servers.

From: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: postgres_fdw: Push down joins to remote servers.
Date: 2016-02-10 06:48:15
Message-ID: CAFjFpReUq1=ygL8x5Rv1J5qJ9r+2J7Prtt1vC8eJhOe6cePpSg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Sorry for the trouble. Thanks Robert for fixing it.

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 2:12 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > Robert Haas <rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> >> postgres_fdw: Push down joins to remote servers.
> >
> > The buildfarm is not very impressed with this patch.
>
> Well, I guess that's why we have regression tests. It looks like that
> test case introduces a dependency on particular CTID values that
> wasn't there before. That doesn't seem like a very good idea; I'll
> remove that test.
>
> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-02-10 13:18:18 pgsql: postgres_fdw: Remove unnecessary variable.
Previous Message pgsql 2016-02-10 01:51:41 pgsql: Tag refs/tags/REL9_3_11 was created

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2016-02-10 06:58:44 Re: Tracing down buildfarm "postmaster does not shut down" failures
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-02-10 06:46:39 Re: Re: BUG #13685: Archiving while idle every archive_timeout with wal_level hot_standby