| From: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: spelling of enable_partition_wise_join |
| Date: | 2018-02-19 07:40:04 |
| Message-ID: | CAFjFpReQ9SPtmkzwX609O+iJ-L=39rWVj+ksMSxPwV_DvEJ-Jg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 9:08 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Thanks. There are functions like try_partition_wise_join(),
> generate_partition_wise_join_paths() which use partition_wise
> spelling. Should we update those as well?
I see that the commit already did that. Sorry. Although, I would have
liked comments to spell "partition-wise" instead of "partitionwise".
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/wise
differentiates between "-wise" and "wise". The later is used when
indicating a direction and the first one indicates "relating to". I
think here we want the first one.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2018-02-19 07:43:52 | Re: pgbench - allow to specify scale as a size |
| Previous Message | Tsunakawa, Takayuki | 2018-02-19 07:05:47 | [doc fix] Correct calculation of vm.nr_hugepages |