Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers

From: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers
Date: 2015-11-09 11:55:16
Message-ID: CAFjFpRe2qAeSy11xJ7YU1vkW0Na81Th2+0AOVd56GJFjsOZTXg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 12:07 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 6:25 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
> <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> > The previous patch would not compile on the latest HEAD. Here's updated
> > patch.
>
> Perhaps unsurprisingly, this doesn't apply any more. But we have
> bigger things to worry about.
>
>
Here's updated patch. I didn't use version numbers in file names in my
previous patches. I am starting from this onwards.

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company

Attachment Content-Type Size
pg_fdw_transact_v1.patch text/x-diff 201.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kouhei Kaigai 2015-11-09 11:56:40 Re: Foreign join pushdown vs EvalPlanQual
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2015-11-09 11:48:54 Re: Some questions about the array.