| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Subject: | Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers |
| Date: | 2015-12-24 03:02:21 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqS9inxOr0Q2ULgmeOS-C0Mf8AKCT_ZFtNeRNeEwQb1etQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 8:55 PM, Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 12:07 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 6:25 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
>> <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>> > The previous patch would not compile on the latest HEAD. Here's updated
>> > patch.
>>
>> Perhaps unsurprisingly, this doesn't apply any more. But we have
>> bigger things to worry about.
>>
>
> Here's updated patch. I didn't use version numbers in file names in my
> previous patches. I am starting from this onwards.
Ashutosh, others, this thread has been stalling for more than 1 month
and a half. There is a new patch that still applies (be careful of
whitespaces btw), but no reviews came in. So what should we do? I
would tend to move this patch to the next CF because of a lack of
reviews.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-12-24 03:02:58 | Re: plpgsql - DECLARE - cannot to use %TYPE or %ROWTYPE for composite types |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-12-24 03:00:11 | Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 |