| From: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [POC] hash partitioning |
| Date: | 2017-10-10 10:13:11 |
| Message-ID: | CAFjFpRdjDUf40jz1pny5BSUfW=5WUvLRy6Ro62az=z11j47mPQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 3:40 PM, amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> natts represents the number of attributes, but for the hash partition bound we
>> are not dealing with the attribute so that I have used short-form of dimension,
>> thoughts?
>
> Okay, I think the dimension(dim) is also unfit here. Any suggestions?
>
I think natts is ok, since we are dealing with the number of
attributes in the pack of datums; esp. when ndatums is already taken.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Aleksander Alekseev | 2017-10-10 10:26:13 | Re: [BUGS] 10.0: Logical replication doesn't execute BEFORE UPDATE OF <columns> trigger |
| Previous Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2017-10-10 10:12:04 | Re: [POC] hash partitioning |