Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers

From: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Vinayak Pokale <pokale_vinayak_q3(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers
Date: 2017-10-03 05:09:56
Message-ID: CAFjFpRdhto9etc1KC-GR_7GB+_Z_sT7zy+vjg_=qvsh8mMVh6A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 9:12 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> It's possible that we might find that neither of the above approaches
> are practical and that the performance benefits of resolving the
> transaction from the original connection are large enough that we want
> to try to make it work anyhow. However, I think we can postpone that
> work to a future time. Any general solution to this problem at least
> needs to be ABLE to resolve transactions at a later time from a
> different session, so let's get that working first, and then see what
> else we want to do.
>

+1.

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-10-03 05:16:18 Re: [sqlsmith] crash in RestoreLibraryState during low-memory testing
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2017-10-03 05:05:25 Re: [sqlsmith] crash in RestoreLibraryState during low-memory testing