From: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Partition : Append node over a single SeqScan |
Date: | 2017-07-05 10:28:59 |
Message-ID: | CAFjFpRddKNJ8O7Px8iNXyDZ4nM-wYfzYT1S2Lp2VUrB4jN+idA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Today while exploring a bit on Range table partitioning, I could see
> that even if scan is performed on a single partition, the plan node
> has Append node in it. Isn't it a bug?
No. See following comment from create_append_plan()
1045 /*
1046 * XXX ideally, if there's just one child, we'd not bother to
generate an
1047 * Append node but just return the single child. At the
moment this does
1048 * not work because the varno of the child scan plan won't match the
1049 * parent-rel Vars it'll be asked to emit.
1050 */
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dilip Kumar | 2017-07-05 11:20:43 | Re: [POC] hash partitioning |
Previous Message | Ashutosh Sharma | 2017-07-05 10:18:39 | Partition : Append node over a single SeqScan |