| From: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Creation of wiki page for open items of v11 |
| Date: | 2018-04-11 13:57:22 |
| Message-ID: | CAFjFpRdN7UKxYnau-ABeNUyEbhNevsF_Aro62k65JOzA_wFhbg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 6:53 PM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2/18/18 22:42, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Okay, I have created a skeleton of page here:
>> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_11_Open_Items
>> Feel free to add any bugs or issues related to v11 that need to be
>> tracked before the release.
>
> Do people find it useful to move the resolved items to a separate
> section on the page, instead of just removing them? I'm not sure that
> the resolved sections are useful, compared to just using the git log.
If we have a section for resolved items, we can keep track of all
items. If we just delete the resolved items, we wouldn't know if it
was a mistake or it was intentional removal.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Teodor Sigaev | 2018-04-11 14:00:55 | Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. |
| Previous Message | Teodor Sigaev | 2018-04-11 13:45:12 | Re: Partitioned tables and covering indexes |