Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6

From: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6
Date: 2017-04-04 12:28:29
Message-ID: CAFjFpRcnGX25rCaHZQfsEfu1WhJEXKZA+SLzAoXTCq059uM26g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
wrote:

>
> I rebased the patch also. Please find attached an updated version of the
> patch.
>

Thanks, marking this as "ready for committer".

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2017-04-04 12:30:12 Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test
Previous Message Amit Langote 2017-04-04 12:17:43 Re: wait event documentation