Re: dropping partitioned tables without CASCADE

From: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: dropping partitioned tables without CASCADE
Date: 2017-09-04 08:02:12
Message-ID: CAFjFpRcVa2LFo+tZMXZggOYYvBwtdWDFzc10gsCd2Tk82pYMCg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> Hi Ashutosh,
>
> On 2017/09/04 13:51, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Thomas's application to track patches told me that this patch needs
>> rebase. It also required some changes to the code. Here's the updated
>> version. I have squashed those two patches together.
>
> Thanks for the rebased patch.
>
> Would it make sense to post them in a new thread? When this message
> popped into my inbox in a thread titled "dropping partitioned tables
> without CASCADE", I wondered for a second if there is still something left
> to be done about that. :)

That would be good. We will have to update the thread in commitfest
entry though.

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-09-04 08:17:19 Re: [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least 9.5)?
Previous Message Andres Freund 2017-09-04 07:04:34 Re: [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least 9.5)?