| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [patch] Proposal for \rotate in psql |
| Date: | 2015-09-19 04:29:18 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRDkjrS4fRirs_=FLiXvBz8K8im+LvWdZ=z+v_Xz+N1=LA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> You're suggesting a [d] choice, subdividing the horizontal headers.
> It seems to me like a pretty radical change, multiplying the number
> of columns, and it has also the potential to give poor results visually.
> Let's see if more feedback comes.
>
yes, I know, plan @d needs lot of new code - and described feature is from
"nice to have" kind.
The prerequisite is enhancing drawing system in psql to support
multiattribute (records) cells - what can be nice feature generally.
Some like:
id | C1 | C2 |
+---+----+---+---+---+---+
|A1 | A2 |A3 |A4 |A5 |A6 |
====+===+====+===+===+===+===+
| | | | | | |
Without this possibility plan @d is impossible.
Regards
Pavel
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Daniel Vérité
> PostgreSQL-powered mailer: http://www.manitou-mail.org
> Twitter: @DanielVerite
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marcin Mańk | 2015-09-19 06:03:12 | Re: [patch] Proposal for \rotate in psql |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2015-09-19 03:32:23 | Re: Reducing ClogControlLock contention |