Re: event trigger support for PL/Python

pá 8. 8. 2025 v 1:31 odesílatel Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com> napsal:

> On Thu, Aug 7, 2025, at 1:53 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > Minimally - you should to use PLPY_DML_TRIGGER instead PLPY_TRIGGER
> >
>
> I didn't use DML terminology for the same reason Peter said in another
> thread
> [1]; let's *not* introduce a new terminology (DML trigger).
>
> > Maybe the name "trigtype" can be better than "is_trigger". The
> > similarity with PLpgSQL has some benefits, but in this case I think so
> > the plpgsql design (of this case) is minimally confusing (and really
> > the related part in plpgsql_compile_callback can be cleaned). How much
> > - this is a question. There are two different things that are mixed
> > together (and this is what I dislike):
> >
>
> I'm fine with trigger kind or trigger type but I wouldn't like to use DML
> trigger.
>
>
> [1]
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1379995202.8103.4.camel@vanquo.pezone.net

ok

Regards

Pavel

>
>
>
> --
> Euler Taveira
> EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
>