From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | aasat <satriani(at)veranet(dot)pl> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: The fastes way to sum array of integers |
Date: | 2012-12-16 16:58:32 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRDfyWZ3Zao3D-qkKoPk1eWfrmNSzU0SHwFkJP+jQzMcig@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
2012/12/16 aasat <satriani(at)veranet(dot)pl>:
> Hi,
>
> I sum values of array integers by query
>
> select sum(t)
> from unnest(array[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,0]) as t
> cross join generate_series(1, 1000000);
>
> Total runtime: 10020.699 ms
>
> But simmilar method to count array's elements is dramatically faster
>
> select sum(array_length(array[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,0], 1))
> from generate_series(1, 1000000)
>
> Total runtime: 464.042 ms
>
>
> It's as fast as simple query!
>
> select sum(1) from generate_series(1, 1000000)
> "Total runtime: 462.687 ms"
>
>
> It is possible that function e.g. array_sum written in C is as fast as
> bult-in array_length?
>
yes - specialized function can be significantly faster - and
aggregation can be calculated with significantly less iterations.
Regards
Pavel
>
> regards
> Wojciech
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/The-fastes-way-to-sum-array-of-integers-tp5736771.html
> Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-12-16 17:19:38 | Re: Default timezone changes in 9.1 |
Previous Message | Peter Bex | 2012-12-16 16:51:23 | Re: Authenticate with hash instead of plaintext password? |