Re: Packages: Again

2017-01-13 20:38 GMT+01:00 Serge Rielau <serge(at)rielau(dot)com>:

>
> > On Jan 13, 2017, at 11:11 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >
> > With Postgres we should to think much more about other PL - there is not
> only PL/pgSQL. So any what we create should be available for any PL. Our
> PLpgSQL is based on total different technology design - so some benefits of
> sharing compiled code across databases has not too value in Postgres.
> Let me stress one last point:
> MODULE’s are 100% orthogonal to PLpgSQL as implement by SFDC and also
> orthogonal to SQL PL as implemented by DB2.
> Modules can (and do for us) contain C-functions of example.
> Similarly when the community provides provides server side session
> variables I have no doubt they will integrate with MODULE’s with very
> little work.
>
> It’s a DDL and name resolution game, predominantly
>

show patch and show a advantages against schema, please.

Regards

Pavel

> Cheers
> Serge