Re: Some questions about the array.

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: YUriy Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Some questions about the array.
Date: 2015-11-09 13:53:48
Message-ID: CAFj8pRDSCpmwwzc9KYTGhGLG8PGUJJUu_-Jk_-8nX-BXPFD+sQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2015-11-09 14:44 GMT+01:00 YUriy Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>:

> On Monday 09 November 2015 13:50:20 Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > New symbols increase a complexity of our code and our documentation.
> >
> > If some functionality can be implemented via functions without
> performance
> > impacts, we should not to create new operators or syntax - mainly for
> > corner use cases.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Pavel
>
> Ok we can use {:} instead [:] for zero array access.
> The function is the solution half.
>

It isn't solution. The any syntax/behave change have to have stronger
motivation. We had so talk about it 20 years ago :(

Regards

Pavel

>
> --
> YUriy Zhuravlev
> Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
> The Russian Postgres Company
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2015-11-09 13:58:18 Re: proposal: PL/Pythonu - function ereport
Previous Message YUriy Zhuravlev 2015-11-09 13:44:45 Re: Some questions about the array.