Re: [PROPOSAL] Make PSQLVAR on \getenv opitional

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Matheus Alcantara <msalcantara(dot)dev(at)pm(dot)me>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Make PSQLVAR on \getenv opitional
Date: 2021-12-28 18:55:15
Message-ID: CAFj8pRDKSVpU2+b9ZPvP+xHsyoV-J=krrsX3U5CYzmw7H_zE1w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

út 28. 12. 2021 v 19:51 odesílatel Matheus Alcantara <msalcantara(dot)dev(at)pm(dot)me>
napsal:

> Hi pgsql hackers, I was testing the new psql command \getenv introduced on
> commit 33d3eeadb2 and from a user perspective, I think that would be nice
> if the PSQLVAR parameter were optional, therefore when it is only necessary
> to view the value of the environment variable, the user just run \getenv,
> for example:
>
> \getenv PATH
> /usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin
>
> And when it is necessary to assign the environment variable in a variable,
> the user could execute like this:
>
> \getenv PATH myvar
> \echo :myvar
> /usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin
>
> For this flexibility the order of parameters would need to be reversed,
> instead of \getenv PSQLVAR ENVVAR would be \getenv ENVVAR PSQLVAR.
>
> What do you guys think? I'm not a C expert but if this proposal is
> interesting I can write a patch.
>

it is not consistent with other \g* commands. Maybe a new statement \senv
? But what is the use case? You can just press ^z and inside shell write
echo $xxx, and then fg

Regards

Pavel

> This is my first time sending an email here, so let me know if I doing
> something wrong.
>
>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matheus Alcantara 2021-12-28 19:26:32 Re: [PROPOSAL] Make PSQLVAR on \getenv opitional
Previous Message Matheus Alcantara 2021-12-28 18:51:26 [PROPOSAL] Make PSQLVAR on \getenv opitional