Re: What do do about Object-Relational label, was Help me improve the 9.2 release announcement!

2012/8/9 Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>:
> On 9 August 2012 18:22, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 20:15 -0700, Chris Travers wrote:
>>
>>> I wonder if it is time to re-examine the term object-relational and
>>> how we explain it.
>>
>> +1.
>>
>> My first suggestion to consider removing the word "object" fell flat,
>> but I think improving the documentation around that term would help
>> avoid confusion (including my confusion).
>
> I think we should call Postgres a multi-model database.

I don't think - PostgreSQL is not NoSQL, it is not column database -
the Stonebraker's category object relational is valid still.

Regards

Pavel

>
> --
> Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-advocacy mailing list (pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-advocacy