From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Petr Jelínek <pjmodos(at)pjmodos(dot)net>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> |
Subject: | Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement |
Date: | 2012-02-28 20:41:13 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRDA=bzYnmKVfG6=ogYPa0EJCsYF5E-8OUBFMkrkvHTFHQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2012/2/28 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>:
>
> Excerpts from Pavel Stehule's message of mar feb 28 16:30:58 -0300 2012:
>
>> I refreshed patch for current git repository.
>
> Thanks, I'll have a look.
>
> Oh, another thing -- you shouldn't patch the 1.0 version of the plpgsql
> extension. Rather I think you should produce a 1.1 version.
>
there is patch with updated tag. I am not sure if there are some
changes in pg_upgrade are necessary??
Regards and thank you
Pavel
> --
> Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
> PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
check_function-2012-02-28-3.diff.gz | application/x-gzip | 29.6 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2012-02-28 20:44:02 | Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2012-02-28 19:42:22 | Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement |