Re: proposal: psql \setfileref

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ryan Murphy <ryanfmurphy(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal: psql \setfileref
Date: 2016-09-26 19:20:00
Message-ID: CAFj8pRD8Y-sRhKTsO99EdEWYfMmiNnga-=bvFycgQeqaUGk2Pg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi

2016-09-26 14:57 GMT+02:00 Ryan Murphy <ryanfmurphy(at)gmail(dot)com>:

> Hi Pavel,
>
> I just tried to apply your patch psql-setfileref-initial.patch (using git
> apply) to the newest revision of postgres at the time (da6c4f6ca88) and it
> failed to patch startup.c. Thinking that the patch was for some previous
> revision, I then checked out d062245b5, which was from 2016-08-31, and
> tried applying the patch from there. I had the same problem:
>
> $ git apply psql-setfileref-initial.patch
> error: patch failed: src/bin/psql/startup.c:106
> error: src/bin/psql/startup.c: patch does not apply
>
> However, when I applied the changes to startup.c manually and removed them
> from the patch, the rest of the patch applied without a problem. I don't
> know if I may have done something wrong in trying to apply the patch, but
> you may want to double check if you need to regenerate your patch from the
> latest revision so it will apply smoothly for reviewers.
>

please, can you check attached patch? It worked in my laptop.

Regards

Pavel

>
> In the meantime, I haven't had a chance to try out the fileref feature yet
> but I'll give it a go when I get a chance!
>
> Thanks!
> Ryan
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>

Attachment Content-Type Size
psql-setfileref-2016-09-26.patch text/x-patch 11.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2016-09-26 19:24:24 Re: pageinspect: Hash index support
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2016-09-26 19:06:18 Re: Showing parallel status in \df+