Re: dropdb --force

po 18. 11. 2019 v 7:39 odesílatel Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
napsal:

>
>
> po 18. 11. 2019 v 7:37 odesílatel Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
> napsal:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:59 AM Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>> > po 18. 11. 2019 v 6:24 odesílatel Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> napsal:
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:33 AM Pavel Stehule <
>> pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > po 18. 11. 2019 v 4:43 odesílatel vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> napsal:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I had seen that isolation test(src/test/isolation) has a framework
>> to
>> >> >> support this. You can have a look to see if it can be handled using
>> >> >> that.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > I'll look there
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> If we want to have a test for this, then you might want to look at
>> >> test src/test/recovery/t/013_crash_restart. In that test, we keep a
>> >> connection open and then validate whether it is terminated. Having
>> >> said that, I think it might be better to add this as a separate test
>> >> patch apart from main patch because it is a bit of a timing-dependent
>> >> test and might fail on some slow machines. We can always revert this
>> >> if it turns out to be an unstable test.
>> >
>> >
>> > +1
>> >
>>
>> So, are you planning to give it a try? I think even if we want to
>> commit this separately, it is better to have a test for this before we
>> commit.
>>
>
> I'll send this test today
>

here is it

Regards

Pavel

>
> Pavel
>
>
>>
>> --
>> With Regards,
>> Amit Kapila.
>> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>
>