Re: shoud be get_extension_schema visible?

po 6. 3. 2023 v 8:33 odesílatel Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> napsal:

> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 06:40:39AM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> >
> > pá 17. 2. 2023 v 6:45 odesílatel Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
> > napsal:
> >
> > > more times I needed to get the extension's assigned namespace. There is
> > > already a cooked function get_extension_schema, but it is static.
> > >
> > > I need to find a function with a known name, but possibly an unknown
> > > schema from a known extension.
> > >
> >
> > Here is an patch
>
> The patch is trivial so I don't have much to say about it, and it also
> seems
> quite reasonable generally.
>
> Note for other reviewers / committers: this is a something actually already
> wanted for 3rd party code. As an example, here's Pavel's code in
> plpgsql_check
> extension that internally has to duplicate this function (and deal with
> compatibility):
> https://github.com/okbob/plpgsql_check/blob/master/src/catalog.c#L205
>
> I'm marking this entry as Ready For Committer.
>

Thank you very much

Pavel