From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Mario Barcala <email(at)mario(dot)barcala(dot)name> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org >> PG-General Mailing List" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Will be Wildspeed inside Postgresql contrib? |
Date: | 2013-11-28 11:16:45 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRCxfwE1WK7yffskqdJ9k=eU8U+3NzohFgDKVL_wo6qXBQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
2013/11/28 Mario Barcala <email(at)mario(dot)barcala(dot)name>
> And have both the same performance about searching speed? Is there any
> comparative and/or analysis?
>
I don't know about any performance analysis. I remember so wildspeed was
not merged to contrib due high large index size.
I expect similar performance.
Pavel
>
> Thank you,
>
> Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
> [...]
> >
> > Same functionality has pg_trgm contrib module
> >
>
> --
> Mario Barcala
> http://www.mario.barcala.name
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-11-28 15:03:47 | Re: unnest on multi-dimensional arrays |
Previous Message | Mario Barcala | 2013-11-28 11:10:18 | Re: Will be Wildspeed inside Postgresql contrib? |