Re: Performance tunning

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: sugnathi hai <suganhai(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performance tunning
Date: 2020-05-30 07:43:43
Message-ID: CAFj8pRCxBYFe=wzgt6YXCOc67dYo4Rr1BGWnLLp6sTQKw5Xv=A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hi

so 30. 5. 2020 v 9:37 odesílatel sugnathi hai <suganhai(at)yahoo(dot)com> napsal:

> Hi ,
>
> Can you help to tune the below plan
>
> Limit (cost=0.87..336777.92 rows=100 width=57) (actual
> time=599302.173..599481.552 rows=100 loops=1) Buffers: shared hit=78496066
> -> Nested Loop (cost=0.87..11005874.67 rows=3268 width=57) (actual
> time=599302.170..599481.506 rows=100 loops=1) Buffers: shared hit=78496066
> -> Index Scan using inx_callprocessingstatus_modifieddate on
> callprocessingstatus contactsta1_ (cost=0.44..2008486.89 rows=15673696
> width=16) (actual time=0.356..66774.105 rows=15651059 loops=1) Index Cond:
> (modifieddate < now()) Filter: ((overallstatus)::text = 'COMPLETED'::text)
> Rows Removed by Filter: 275880 Buffers: shared hit=15803632 -> Index Scan
> using "INX_callinfo_Callid" on callinfo contact0_ (cost=0.43..0.57 rows=1
> width=49) (actual time=0.033..0.033 rows=0 loops=15651059) Index Cond:
> (callid = contactsta1_.callid) Filter: ((combinationkey IS NULL) AND
> (mod(callid, '2'::bigint) = 0)) Rows Removed by Filter: 1 Buffers: shared
> hit=62692434 Planning Time: 1.039 ms Execution Time: 599481.758 ms
>

Can you show a query related to this plan?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2020-05-30 14:19:51 Re: Performance tunning
Previous Message sugnathi hai 2020-05-30 07:36:49 Performance tunning