Re: New CORRESPONDING clause design

Hi

2017-03-10 13:49 GMT+01:00 Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>:

> Hi
>
> 2017-03-10 12:55 GMT+01:00 Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>
>>
>>
>> 2017-03-10 10:13 GMT+01:00 Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>>
>>> Yes, you are correct it should to work on CORRESPONDING clause case. SQL
>>> 20nn standard draft only said each query to be of the same degree in a case
>>> of set operation without corresponding clause. The attached patch is
>>> corrected as such .I add those new test case to regression test too
>>>
>>
>> Thank you - I will recheck it.
>>
>
> Fast check - it looks well
>

I am sending minor update - cleaning formatting and white spaces, error
messages + few more tests

It is working very well.

Maybe correspondingClause needs own node type with attached location. Then
context can be much better positioned.

Regards

Pavel

>
> Regards
>
> Pavel
>