Re: New CORRESPONDING clause design

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New CORRESPONDING clause design
Date: 2017-03-10 12:49:34
Message-ID: CAFj8pRBkigjdohBbCiTsw4qNqdRMa-ko1j=d6wH_mCtJ2hQd8w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi

2017-03-10 12:55 GMT+01:00 Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>:

>
>
> 2017-03-10 10:13 GMT+01:00 Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>
>> Yes, you are correct it should to work on CORRESPONDING clause case. SQL
>> 20nn standard draft only said each query to be of the same degree in a case
>> of set operation without corresponding clause. The attached patch is
>> corrected as such .I add those new test case to regression test too
>>
>
> Thank you - I will recheck it.
>

Fast check - it looks well

Regards

Pavel

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-03-10 12:51:15 Re: Write Ahead Logging for Hash Indexes
Previous Message Aleksander Alekseev 2017-03-10 12:16:58 Re: Declarative partitioning optimization for large amount of partitions