Re: less log level for success dynamic background workers for 9.5

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: less log level for success dynamic background workers for 9.5
Date: 2015-06-27 08:32:53
Message-ID: CAFj8pRCjYoMcfsojtf7pJ1PZhOCQMs6ZHmNUGmVEoS2Ah5py0g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2015-06-26 17:28 GMT+02:00 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:

> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >> I think it's a whole separate topicto Pavel's original proposal
> >> though, and really merits a separate thread. For Pavel's issue I'm all
> >> in favour of just changing the log message, I think LOG is way too
> >> high for something that's internal implementation detail.
> >
> > +1.
>
> OK, I have committed Pavel's patch.
>

Thank you

Pavel

>
> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kouhei Kaigai 2015-06-27 11:21:56 Re: Schedule for 9.5alpha1
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2015-06-27 08:07:54 Re: Removing SSL renegotiation (Was: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes?)