Re: proposal: new polymorphic types - commontype and commontypearray

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal: new polymorphic types - commontype and commontypearray
Date: 2019-05-24 18:03:48
Message-ID: CAFj8pRCevRH3PuM=9dt+YQe-AKiiGdK+9YqJpbUX+o8LmF8UpA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi

út 5. 3. 2019 v 18:37 odesílatel Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
napsal:

>
>
> út 5. 3. 2019 v 15:35 odesílatel Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> napsal:
>
>> David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> writes:
>> > This thread has been very quiet for a month. I agree with Andres [1]
>> > that we should push this to PG13.
>>
>> I think the main thing it's blocked on is disagreement on what the
>> type name should be, which is kind of a silly thing to get blocked on,
>> but nonetheless it's important ...
>>
>
> I sent some others possible names, but probably this mail was forgotten
>
> What about "ctype" like shortcut for common type? carraytype,
> cnonarraytype?
>

rebase for PostgreSQL 13

Regards

Pavel

> Regards
>
> Pavel
>
>>
>> regards, tom lane
>>
>

Attachment Content-Type Size
common-type-20190524.patch text/x-patch 67.9 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Dilger 2019-05-24 18:53:17 Nitpick about assumptions in indexam and tableam
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-05-24 17:59:01 Re: BUG #15781: subselect on foreign table (postgres_fdw) can crash (segfault)