Re: missing support of named convention for procedures

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: missing support of named convention for procedures
Date: 2018-03-16 10:31:41
Message-ID: CAFj8pRCYtuviU8V3Jn1bN-6jaO10ZWFDp2-Es+gzssDGyaBwZA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2018-03-16 11:29 GMT+01:00 Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>:

>
>
> 2018-03-16 8:43 GMT+01:00 Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>
>>
>>
>> 2018-03-15 22:13 GMT+01:00 Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> create or replace procedure proc2(in a int, in b int)
>>> as $$
>>> begin
>>> a := a * 10;
>>> b := b * 10;
>>> end;
>>> $$ language plpgsql;
>>>
>>> postgres=# call proc2(a => 10,b => 20);
>>> ERROR: XX000: unrecognized node type: 107
>>> LOCATION: ExecInitExprRec, execExpr.c:2114
>>>
>>
>> Defaults are not supported too:
>>
>> postgres=# create or replace procedure foo1(a int, b int, c int default
>> 10)
>> as $$
>> begin
>> raise notice 'a: %, b: %, c: %', a, b, c;
>> end;
>> $$ language plpgsql;
>> CREATE PROCEDURE
>> postgres=# call foo1(10,20);
>> NOTICE: 00000: a: 10, b: 20, c: -778600432
>> LOCATION: exec_stmt_raise, pl_exec.c:3643
>> CALL
>>
>
> attached patch fixes it
>
> Regards
>
> Pavel
>

variadic parameters are supported too.

>
>
>>
>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Pavel
>>>
>>
>>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Arthur Zakirov 2018-03-16 10:38:31 Re: pg_get_functiondef forgets about most GUC_LIST_INPUT GUCs
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2018-03-16 10:29:59 Re: missing support of named convention for procedures