From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Rodrigo Barboza <rodrigombufrj(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: effective_cache_size on 32-bits postgres |
Date: | 2013-03-18 18:33:49 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRCT6W4Hi0cKAySkzdC90Dho2jUMtgwGg0X575XXQWkKAA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
2013/3/18 Rodrigo Barboza <rodrigombufrj(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> So setting this as half of ram, as suggested in postgres tuning webpage
> should be safe?
> It says it is a conservative value...
depends how much memory is used as cache ??
it can be a shared_buffers + file system cache
Regards
Pavel Stehule
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>>
>> 2013/3/18 Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>> > Hello
>> >
>> > 2013/3/18 Rodrigo Barboza <rodrigombufrj(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>> >> Hi guys, I am worried about the effective_cache_size.
>> >> I run a 32-bits postgres installation on a machine with 64 bits kernel.
>> >> Should I limit effective_cache_size to a maximum of 2.5gb?
>> >
>> > sure and probably little bit less
>>
>> wrong reply - Rob has true
>>
>> Pavel
>>
>> >
>> > Regards
>> >
>> > Pavel
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2013-03-18 18:47:05 | Re: effective_cache_size on 32-bits postgres |
Previous Message | Rodrigo Barboza | 2013-03-18 18:23:56 | Re: effective_cache_size on 32-bits postgres |