Re: PL/pgSQL, RAISE and error context

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL, RAISE and error context
Date: 2015-07-09 15:48:08
Message-ID: CAFj8pRCJyTPO0fv=jQiBTDcM5WFPHc8DScOpKRgzReoFm1h8Tg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2015-07-09 15:17 GMT+02:00 Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>:

> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:28 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > second version of this patch
> >
> > make check-world passed
>
> quickly scanning the patch, the implementation is trivial (minus
> regression test adjustments), and is, IMSNSHO, the right solution.
>

yes, it is right way - the behave of RAISE statement will be much more
cleaner

>
> Several of the source level comments need some minor wordsmithing and
> the GUCs are missing documentation. If we've got consensus on the
> approach, I'll pitch in on that.
>

thank you

Pavel

>
> merlin
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Petr Jelinek 2015-07-09 16:05:22 Re: creating extension including dependencies
Previous Message Ildus Kurbangaliev 2015-07-09 15:00:19 Re: Waits monitoring