From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PL/pgSQL, RAISE and error context |
Date: | 2015-07-09 15:48:08 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRCJyTPO0fv=jQiBTDcM5WFPHc8DScOpKRgzReoFm1h8Tg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2015-07-09 15:17 GMT+02:00 Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:28 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > second version of this patch
> >
> > make check-world passed
>
> quickly scanning the patch, the implementation is trivial (minus
> regression test adjustments), and is, IMSNSHO, the right solution.
>
yes, it is right way - the behave of RAISE statement will be much more
cleaner
>
> Several of the source level comments need some minor wordsmithing and
> the GUCs are missing documentation. If we've got consensus on the
> approach, I'll pitch in on that.
>
thank you
Pavel
>
> merlin
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Petr Jelinek | 2015-07-09 16:05:22 | Re: creating extension including dependencies |
Previous Message | Ildus Kurbangaliev | 2015-07-09 15:00:19 | Re: Waits monitoring |