Re: patch: function xmltable

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: patch: function xmltable
Date: 2016-11-30 15:21:37
Message-ID: CAFj8pRCGEwHjZPpURAo7syx8vsMO8eZE+YVnaDZFWgHhZxgeTA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dne 30. 11. 2016 14:53 napsal uživatel "Pavel Stehule" <
pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>
>
>
> 2016-11-30 13:38 GMT+01:00 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>:
>>
>> Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> > 2016-11-30 2:40 GMT+01:00 Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>:
>> >
>> > > On 30 November 2016 at 05:36, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > The problem is in unreserved keyword "PASSING" probably.
>> > >
>> > > Yeah, I think that's what I hit when trying to change it.
>> > >
>> > > Can't you just parenthesize the expression to use operators like ||
>> > > etc? If so, not a big deal.
>> > >
>> > ???
>>
>> "'(' a_expr ')'" is a c_expr; Craig suggests that we can just tell users
>> to manually add parens around any expressions that they want to use.
>> That's not necessary most of the time since we've been able to use
>> b_expr in most places.
>

still there are one c_expr, but without new reserved word there are not
change to reduce it.

>
> Now I understand
>
> Regards
>
> Pavel
>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
>> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2016-11-30 15:24:08 Re: Minor correction in alter_table.sgml
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2016-11-30 14:52:32 Re: Mail thread references in commits