Re: new unicode table border styles for psql

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Szymon Guz <mabewlun(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: new unicode table border styles for psql
Date: 2013-11-29 07:28:01
Message-ID: CAFj8pRCA7H2ndgtWmaiYKX50YQThre=v+bQfpCbTuJyRig_sPA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2013/11/28 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>

> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> > Now for the linestyles. I can see how some of them are attractive, but
> > several of them have poor aesthetics, I think. I don't see a reason to
> > accept 7 new styles just for fun. If I had to choose, I'd consider
> > -double1 and -double4 to be acceptable.
>
> I'm confused why we need ANY of these. What problem are we solving
> that the existing unicode style doesn't already solve? We could
> doubtless invent an infinite or at least very large number of
> plausible ways to border psql output, but I don't see that as
> something that has value.
>

It has primary aesthetic value - not much more (similar value has original
unicode border)

With this patch you can prepare a little bit nicer (plain text) reports
without using special software. And a implementation is really simply - so
it offer sympathetic benefit without any cost.

Regards

Pavel

>
> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2013-11-29 07:33:04 Re: new unicode table border styles for psql
Previous Message Rajeev rastogi 2013-11-29 06:41:59 Re: TODO: Split out pg_resetxlog output into pre- and post-sections