From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> |
Cc: | Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 |
Date: | 2016-01-13 15:34:29 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRC8R+BiEtvT8Pgv0wZnrSvjnXEmKEcCkLHUWCjHANTv-w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
2016-01-13 16:18 GMT+01:00 Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>:
> Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > I like a strategy based on risks. Probably there are situation, when the
> generic plan is great every
> > time - INSERTs, UPDATEs via PK, simple SELECTs via PK. generic plan can
> be well if almost all data has
> > similar probability. Elsewhere on bigger data, the probability of pretty
> slow plan is higher, and then
> > we should to prefer custom plan.
> >
> > so the strategy - if cost of generic plan is less than some MAGIC
> CONSTANT (can be specified by GUC),
> > then use generic plan. Elsewhere use a custom plan everytime.
> >
> > It allow to controll the plan reusing. When MAGIC CONSTANT = 0 .. use
> custom plan everytime, When
> > MAGIC CONSTANT = M, then use generic plan always.
>
> I have a different idea:
>
> What about a GUC "custom_plan_threshold" that controls after how many
> executions a generic plan will be considered, with a default value of 5.
>
> A value of -1 could disable generic plans.
>
yes, I though about it too - it is simple, and almost deterministic
Pavel
>
> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2016-01-13 15:43:58 | Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 |
Previous Message | Vladimir Sitnikov | 2016-01-13 15:22:49 | Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2016-01-13 15:43:58 | Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 |
Previous Message | Vladimir Sitnikov | 2016-01-13 15:22:49 | Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 |