Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>
Cc: Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102
Date: 2016-01-13 15:34:29
Message-ID: CAFj8pRC8R+BiEtvT8Pgv0wZnrSvjnXEmKEcCkLHUWCjHANTv-w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

2016-01-13 16:18 GMT+01:00 Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>:

> Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > I like a strategy based on risks. Probably there are situation, when the
> generic plan is great every
> > time - INSERTs, UPDATEs via PK, simple SELECTs via PK. generic plan can
> be well if almost all data has
> > similar probability. Elsewhere on bigger data, the probability of pretty
> slow plan is higher, and then
> > we should to prefer custom plan.
> >
> > so the strategy - if cost of generic plan is less than some MAGIC
> CONSTANT (can be specified by GUC),
> > then use generic plan. Elsewhere use a custom plan everytime.
> >
> > It allow to controll the plan reusing. When MAGIC CONSTANT = 0 .. use
> custom plan everytime, When
> > MAGIC CONSTANT = M, then use generic plan always.
>
> I have a different idea:
>
> What about a GUC "custom_plan_threshold" that controls after how many
> executions a generic plan will be considered, with a default value of 5.
>
> A value of -1 could disable generic plans.
>

yes, I though about it too - it is simple, and almost deterministic

Pavel

>
> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2016-01-13 15:43:58 Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102
Previous Message Vladimir Sitnikov 2016-01-13 15:22:49 Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2016-01-13 15:43:58 Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102
Previous Message Vladimir Sitnikov 2016-01-13 15:22:49 Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102