| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: merging some features from plpgsql2 project |
| Date: | 2017-01-09 09:05:49 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRC5fxHtdq8Z+Qo-EwNBJnkJEdXhHN9AwhjDUphLaX62-g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2017-01-09 0:39 GMT+01:00 Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>:
> On 1/7/17 11:44 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
>> This is not overloading of SQL command - it is like annotations. It is
>> smart idea, so I was not surprised if ANSI/SQL reuses it.
>>
>
> SHas ANSI declared that they will NEVER support := in a SELECT that's not
> running in a stored function? Because if they haven't done that, there's
> nothing preventing them from doing just that. If that happens we're going
> to have some very difficult choices to make.
No, there is nothing declared in ANSI. But currently in ANSI is not using
one operator for two different thing.
Regards
Pavel
>
> --
> Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
> Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
> Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
> 855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2017-01-09 09:15:16 | Re: RustgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2017-01-09 09:01:40 | Re: Block level parallel vacuum WIP |