Re: Documentation about PL transforms

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Documentation about PL transforms
Date: 2022-07-29 18:47:59
Message-ID: CAFj8pRBqBNa7Ocz4v14TOrs1dLiEvjN_=NBATC1PnX0AdToaDA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

pá 29. 7. 2022 v 18:35 odesílatel <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net> napsal:

> On 2022-07-28 01:51, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> >> Would it be clearer to say:
> >>
> >> It also contains the OID of the intended procedural language and
> >> whether
> >> that procedural language is declared as <literal>TRUSTED</literal>.
> >> While these values are redundant if the inline handler is serving only
> >> a single procedural language, they are necessary to allow one inline
> >> handler to serve more than one PL.
> >
> > ok
>
> I will probably be unable to produce a new patch for this CF.
> Family obligation.
>

ok

Regards

Pavel

>
> Regards,
> -Chap
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2022-07-29 18:48:27 Re: Maximize page freezing
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2022-07-29 18:44:52 Re: enable/disable broken for statement triggers on partitioned tables