Re: Documentation about PL transforms

From: chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Documentation about PL transforms
Date: 2022-07-29 16:35:20
Message-ID: 58ee88a2fdca4f9597f98616e5d7a936@anastigmatix.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2022-07-28 01:51, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> Would it be clearer to say:
>>
>> It also contains the OID of the intended procedural language and
>> whether
>> that procedural language is declared as <literal>TRUSTED</literal>.
>> While these values are redundant if the inline handler is serving only
>> a single procedural language, they are necessary to allow one inline
>> handler to serve more than one PL.
>
> ok

I will probably be unable to produce a new patch for this CF.
Family obligation.

Regards,
-Chap

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Reid Thompson 2022-07-29 16:43:45 Oversight in slab.c SlabContextCreate(), initial memory allocation size is not populated to context->mem_allocated
Previous Message Robert Haas 2022-07-29 15:56:02 Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning