| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masao Fujii <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Showing parallel status in \df+ |
| Date: | 2016-08-26 04:20:38 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRBpTN92oOqm2vdJ40A0pwO0qRCPPVAuAnqEXy1HeOfHhw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2016-08-24 15:42 GMT+02:00 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > On 8/22/16 1:52 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> >> If I understand to purpose of this patch - it is compromise - PL source
> >> is removed from table, but it is printed in result.
>
> > What does it do if you are displaying more than one function?
>
> It prints more than one footer. It's very much like the way that, say,
> rules are printed for tables by \d.
>
>
Using footer for this purpose is little bit strange. What about following
design?
1. move out source code of PL functions from \df+
2. allow not unique filter in \sf and allow to display multiple functions
Regards
Pavel
> regards, tom lane
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2016-08-26 04:23:02 | Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-08-26 04:07:09 | Re: increasing the default WAL segment size |