| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: proposal \gcsv |
| Date: | 2020-04-08 04:16:18 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRBj7bbpepaORL-cpxDrFM1bkFf5eWKBj6ObRHo4ONUY1A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
út 7. 4. 2020 v 23:47 odesílatel Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> napsal:
> Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > út 7. 4. 2020 v 19:27 odesílatel Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> napsal:
> >> Considering this is the last day before v13 feature freeze, should
> >> I push this, or sit on it till v14? I feel reasonably good that we
> >> have a nice feature definition here, but it's awfully late in the
> >> cycle to be designing features.
>
> > I am for pushing to v13. This feature should not to break any, and there
> is
> > lot of time to finish details.
>
> Hearing no objections, pushed.
>
Thank you
Pavel
> regards, tom lane
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Gierth | 2020-04-08 04:29:24 | Re: FETCH FIRST clause WITH TIES option |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2020-04-08 04:10:27 | Re: doc review for parallel vacuum |