| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: proposal: plpgsql - Assert statement |
| Date: | 2014-10-17 11:12:05 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRBW1Fx132NxT=xuedWJmaxScdcMpMvTre=pMPGRZmE1fg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2014-10-17 9:14 GMT+02:00 Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>:
> On 16/10/14 13:29, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> 2014-10-14 22:57 GMT+02:00 Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com
>>
>> Short review of the patch. Note that this has nothing to do with
>> actual assertions, at the moment it's just enhancement of RAISE
>> statement to make it optionally conditional. As I was one of the
>> people who voted for it I do think we want this and I like the syntax.
>>
>> Code applies cleanly, seems formatted according to project standards
>> - there is unnecessary whitespace added in variable declaration part
>> of exec_stmt_raise which should be removed.
>>
>>
>> fixed
>>
>>
>> Passes make check, I would prefer to have little more complex
>> expression than just "true" in the new regression test added for
>> this feature.
>>
>>
>> fixed
>>
>>
>> Did some manual testing, seems to work as advertised.
>>
>> There are no docs at the moment which is the only show-stopper that
>> I can see so far.
>>
>>
>> fixed
>>
>>
> Great, looks good to me, marking as ready for committer.
Thank you very much
Pavel
>
>
> --
> Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2014-10-17 11:12:18 | Re: CREATE POLICY and RETURNING |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2014-10-17 10:59:33 | Re: pg_receivexlog --status-interval add fsync feedback |