From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: ToDo: show size of partitioned table |
Date: | 2018-06-01 15:21:52 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRBVCe-XFxH=Hthr13yjbo8WKuo6QMndQZDEHtBgx6KqQQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2018-06-01 17:15 GMT+02:00 Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>:
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 12:56 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > postgres=# SELECT count(*) from data;
> > ┌─────────┐
> > │ count │
> > ╞═════════╡
> > │ 1000000 │
> > └─────────┘
> > (1 row)
> >
> > \dt+ can display actual size of partitioned table data - now zero is
> > displayed
> >
> > postgres=# \dt+ data
> > List of relations
> > ┌────────┬──────┬───────┬───────┬─────────┬─────────────┐
> > │ Schema │ Name │ Type │ Owner │ Size │ Description │
> > ╞════════╪══════╪═══════╪═══════╪═════════╪═════════════╡
> > │ public │ data │ table │ pavel │ 0 bytes │ │
> > └────────┴──────┴───────┴───────┴─────────┴─────────────┘
> > (1 row)
>
> I think we should at least display "Type" as "partitioned table" for a
> partitioned table, so that it's easy to understand why the size is 0;
> partitioned tables do not hold any data by themselves.
>
should be.
Some is missing still - there is not any total size across all partitions.
maybe new command like
\dtP+ .. show partitioned tables and their size
Regards
Pavel
> --
> Best Wishes,
> Ashutosh Bapat
> EnterpriseDB Corporation
> The Postgres Database Company
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-06-01 15:27:14 | Re: I'd like to discuss scaleout at PGCon |
Previous Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2018-06-01 15:15:33 | Re: ToDo: show size of partitioned table |