Re: Migrate to autoconf 2.72?

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)tigerdata(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Migrate to autoconf 2.72?
Date: 2025-12-01 13:40:08
Message-ID: CAFj8pRBTUJLediMDVrk=dbqT=RzB9c8OaP9z0HzgGN-EYy_MEw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

po 1. 12. 2025 v 13:45 odesílatel Aleksander Alekseev <
aleksander(at)tigerdata(dot)com> napsal:

> Hi,
>
> > I am not sure if there are some authorities who specified some generic
> template of meson.build for extensions.
> > [...]
> > but now, there is zero support for meson for extension from Postgres
> side.
>
> contrib/*/meson.build seem quite generic and quite supported.
>
> Or perhaps I don't quite understand the complexity you mentioned?
> Maybe you could give a particular example?
>

you can try to compare
https://github.com/okbob/plpgsql_check/blob/master/meson.build

versus

https://github.com/okbob/plpgsql_check/blob/master/Makefile

The meson does one target more in this case, so these files are not 100%
comparable - maybe at 75%, but still - for Make, I have almost all logic
in include $(PGXS)

>
> --
> Best regards,
> Aleksander Alekseev
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bertrand Drouvot 2025-12-01 13:45:00 Safer hash table initialization macro
Previous Message tushar 2025-12-01 13:06:48 Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall