| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)tigerdata(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Migrate to autoconf 2.72? |
| Date: | 2025-12-01 13:40:08 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRBTUJLediMDVrk=dbqT=RzB9c8OaP9z0HzgGN-EYy_MEw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
po 1. 12. 2025 v 13:45 odesílatel Aleksander Alekseev <
aleksander(at)tigerdata(dot)com> napsal:
> Hi,
>
> > I am not sure if there are some authorities who specified some generic
> template of meson.build for extensions.
> > [...]
> > but now, there is zero support for meson for extension from Postgres
> side.
>
> contrib/*/meson.build seem quite generic and quite supported.
>
> Or perhaps I don't quite understand the complexity you mentioned?
> Maybe you could give a particular example?
>
you can try to compare
https://github.com/okbob/plpgsql_check/blob/master/meson.build
versus
https://github.com/okbob/plpgsql_check/blob/master/Makefile
The meson does one target more in this case, so these files are not 100%
comparable - maybe at 75%, but still - for Make, I have almost all logic
in include $(PGXS)
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Aleksander Alekseev
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bertrand Drouvot | 2025-12-01 13:45:00 | Safer hash table initialization macro |
| Previous Message | tushar | 2025-12-01 13:06:48 | Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall |