Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement
Date: 2012-03-07 05:35:06
Message-ID: CAFj8pRBQNLygN3_+LMtw=RvrM6db1o41+qJbf1xF9hQSpgW7Fg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello

I found one small issue where Query was not forwarded when trigger
record was broken. I had to append "context" forwarding.

Regards

Pavel

2012/3/6 Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> Hello
>
> there is new version
>
> * fixed small formatting issues related to drop SPI call
> * long functions was divided
> * CREATE TRIGGER ALL ON table support
>
> Regards
>
> Pavel

Attachment Content-Type Size
check_function-2012-03-07-1.patch.gz application/x-gzip 34.0 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2012-03-07 06:14:57 Re: Speed dblink using alternate libpq tuple storage
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2012-03-07 05:17:07 Re: poll: CHECK TRIGGER?