Re: PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or generic plan

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>
Subject: Re: PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or generic plan
Date: 2017-03-28 19:10:23
Message-ID: CAFj8pRBPrHXE2Kp3gihvSEoZZdcFb8SFCKO1oV9F-0=NsOKWag@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2017-03-28 20:29 GMT+02:00 Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>:

> On 28/03/17 19:43, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > rebased due last changes in pg_exec.c
> >
>
> Thanks, I went over this and worked over the documentation/comments a
> bit (attached updated version of the patch with my changes).
>
> From my side this can go to committer.
>

Thank you

Pavel

>
> --
> Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-03-28 19:24:28 Re: Protection lost in expression eval changeover
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2017-03-28 18:56:09 Re: [patch] reorder tablespaces in basebackup tar stream for backup_label