Re: Re: Support plpgsql multi-range in conditional control

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "2903807914(at)qq(dot)com" <2903807914(at)qq(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Support plpgsql multi-range in conditional control
Date: 2023-01-19 16:17:24
Message-ID: CAFj8pRBKxS0LQePGT5n-5RK3A0eMAqFMimHMgDdSU4HdP8Ufqw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

čt 19. 1. 2023 v 16:54 odesílatel Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
napsal:

>
>
> čt 19. 1. 2023 v 15:20 odesílatel 2903807914(at)qq(dot)com <2903807914(at)qq(dot)com>
> napsal:
>
>> Hello, thank you very much for your reply. But I think you may have
>> misunderstood what we have done.
>>
>> What we do this time is that we can use multiple range ranges
>> (condition_iterator) after in. Previously, we can only use such an interval
>> [lower, upper] after in, but in some scenarios, we may need a list: *condition_
>> iterator[,condition_iterator ...]*
>>
>> condition_iterator:
>> [ REVERSE ] expression .. expression [ BY expression ]
>>
>
> then you can use second outer for over an array or just while cycle
>

I wrote simple example:

create type range_expr as (r int4range, s int);

do
$$
declare re range_expr;
begin
foreach re in array ARRAY[('[10, 20]', 1), ('[100, 200]', 10)]
loop
for i in lower(re.r) .. upper(re.r) by re.s
loop
raise notice '%', i;
end loop;
end loop;
end;
$$;

But just I don't know what is wrong on

begin
for i in 10..20
loop
raise notice '%', i;
end loop;

for i in 100 .. 200 by 10
loop
raise notice '%', i;
end loop;
end;

and if there are some longer bodies you should use function or procedure.
Any different cycle is separated. PLpgSQL (like PL/SQL or ADA) are verbose
languages. There is no goal to have short, heavy code.

Regards

Pavel

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2023-01-19 16:30:21 Re: Remove source code display from \df+?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-01-19 16:13:30 Re: Rethinking the implementation of ts_headline()