Re: missing support of named convention for procedures

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: missing support of named convention for procedures
Date: 2018-03-16 07:43:06
Message-ID: CAFj8pRBJvEcbVZqdU0kyVyBZb0wDGqPTX-00j+wO80JxGHzGTw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2018-03-15 22:13 GMT+01:00 Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>:

> Hi
>
> create or replace procedure proc2(in a int, in b int)
> as $$
> begin
> a := a * 10;
> b := b * 10;
> end;
> $$ language plpgsql;
>
> postgres=# call proc2(a => 10,b => 20);
> ERROR: XX000: unrecognized node type: 107
> LOCATION: ExecInitExprRec, execExpr.c:2114
>

Defaults are not supported too:

postgres=# create or replace procedure foo1(a int, b int, c int default 10)
as $$
begin
raise notice 'a: %, b: %, c: %', a, b, c;
end;
$$ language plpgsql;
CREATE PROCEDURE
postgres=# call foo1(10,20);
NOTICE: 00000: a: 10, b: 20, c: -778600432
LOCATION: exec_stmt_raise, pl_exec.c:3643
CALL

> Regards
>
> Pavel
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Konstantin Knizhnik 2018-03-16 08:03:03 Re: WaitLatchOrSocket optimization
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2018-03-16 07:30:02 Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql - additional extra checks