Re: Some questions about the array.

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: YUriy Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Some questions about the array.
Date: 2015-11-11 16:29:31
Message-ID: CAFj8pRB7-aRXgjB0ppLriPRBxi=vsiJpFx6y8yHEhx8y-vjG+g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2015-11-11 12:25 GMT+01:00 YUriy Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>:

> On Friday 06 November 2015 12:55:44 you wrote:
> > Omitted bounds are common in other languages and would be handy. I
> > don't think they'd cause any issues with multi-dimensional arrays or
> > variable start-pos arrays.
>
> And yet, what about my patch?
> Discussions about ~ and{:} it seems optional.
>

In this case the syntax is major issue. Any language should not to have any
possible feature on the world.

My opinion on this proposal is same - the general benefit for users is
minimal and disputable - Introduction new syntax is wrong idea.

So -1

Pavel

>
> Thanks.
> --
> YUriy Zhuravlev
> Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
> The Russian Postgres Company
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-11-11 16:31:37 Re: bootstrap pg_shseclabel in relcache initialization
Previous Message Nikolay Shaplov 2015-11-11 15:41:50 Re: pageinspect patch, for showing tuple data