Re: Variable substitution in psql backtick expansion

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Variable substitution in psql backtick expansion
Date: 2017-04-17 04:05:10
Message-ID: CAFj8pRB6a7Z_H2s-NNxEGKanp1kQH9gjVNSYnS5sPMUjR7=7Lw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2017-04-17 1:00 GMT+02:00 Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>:

>
> I checked the pgbench expr related code.
>>
>
> 2. move pgbench expressions to separate module
>>
>
> Probably already existing "fe_utils".
>
> 3. teach pgbench expressions booleans
>>
>
> See https://commitfest.postgresql.org/14/985/

so some work is done :)

Regards

Pavel

>
>
> --
> Fabien.
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2017-04-17 05:03:24 Re: Inadequate parallel-safety check for SubPlans
Previous Message Amit Langote 2017-04-17 03:58:12 Re: Shouldn't duplicate addition to publication be a no-op?